Search for: ""name image and likeness"" Results 141 - 160 of 319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2022, 8:59 am by Amy L. Peck and Brenda Oliver
Prior to 2021, collegiate student-athletes were not able to make sponsorship deals and profit from their names, images, and likenesses (NILs). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:14 am by R. Devin Ricci and Randy Cangelosi
In the United States, name, image, and likeness (“NIL”) are the three elements that make up a legal concept known as the right of publicity. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 12:50 pm by Holly Brezee
By: Michael Lehr Ready – Set – Shift: NCAA’s NIL Overhaul NCAA Student-Athletes MAY Now Be Able to Monetize Their Name, Image, and Likeness | Part 2 This is part two of a four part series; If you would like to go back and read part one of “Ready – Set – Shift: NCAA’s NIL Overhaul,” click here. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 5:55 am by Above the Law
[National Law Journal] * Class cert granted for college athletes seeking an injunction against the NCAA for antitrust violations related to their name, image, and likeness rights. [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:15 am by Nadia Aram
He is just the latest celebrity to seek to protect his/her rights of publicity (giving a person commercial control of their name, image and likeness) through legal action. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
Cohen issued a preliminary injunction in Milstein’s favor because the court concluded there was no expiration date for the use of Nicklaus's name, image, and likeness. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 11:15 am by IPWatchdog
This week in Other Barks & Bites: Michael Kroll, an often-sanctioned patent attorney, is barred from practice before the USPTO; the Federal Circuit orders Judge Albright to grant motions to transfer patent suits filed by Ikorongo to Northern California; the NCAA issues a new policy allowing student-athletes to license name, image and likeness rights; the Supreme Court limits but doesn’t abandon the doctrine of assignor estoppel; the Copyright Office announces… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 1:59 pm by Zak Read
On February 2, 2021, EA Sports made an announcement that excited college sports fans everywhere––the NCAA football game that many had grown to love before its discontinuation in 2014 would be returning in 2023.[1] Along with this excitement came a reignited debate about whether student-athletes should be paid for the use of their name, image, and likeness (“NIL”); an issue that contributed to the game’s discontinuation.[2] Despite the profit… [read post]
10 May 2021, 10:17 am by Darren Heitner
As many as 150 NIL platforms have been created to provide a variety of services to athletes and universities. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 11:14 am by Darren Heitner
Democrats and Republicans should come together to ensure that all college athletes across the U.S. are afforded the ability to exploit their publicity rights sooner rather than later. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 4:13 am by Jeremy Telman
Tom Brady: From G.O.A.T. to Scapegoat: A Cautionary Tale of Influencer and Endorser Liability Sidney W. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Zachary Fasman
Given the recent spate of state laws allowing student-athletes to hire agents and obtain compensation for their name, image and likeness (NIL), the NCAA’s ability to preserve “traditional” college sports may be very limited.Alston came to the Court on a full record, after years of discovery and a 10-day bench trial before Judge Claudia Wilken in San Francisco. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm by Anna E. Bullock
Alston secured student-athletes’ right to monetize their name, image, and likeness (or NIL). [read post]
With the rise of name, image, and likeness (“NIL”), direct payment of players, and licensing in video games, the world of college athletics is a hotbed of legal activity. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 10:54 am by LTA-Editor
Throwing the Flag on Pay-for-Play: The O’Bannon Ruling and the Future of Paid Student Athletes by Senior Submissions Editor Joseph Davison analyzes the recent rulings in favor of the NCAA rules preventing players from being paid for the use of their names, images, or likenesses. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:08 am
At the time of this order, four of the Plaintiffs (the "Right-of-Publicity Plaintiffs") alleged that the NCAA misappropriated their names, images and likenesses in violation of their statutory and common law rights of publicity. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
  And, that person’s brand is their name, image, and likeness. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:21 pm
Plaintiffs define the putative class in pertinent part as: “All California residents whose names, images, or likenesses have been exploited by Corbis, without their permission, during the applicable statute of limitations time period through Corbis’ sale of purported licenses to use said names, images, or likenesses to consumers via that Company’s websites, including www.corbis.com, www.corbismotion.com, or… [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:10 pm by David Kravets
In particular, Maximum’s conduct has damaged the value to CMG of General Patton's name, image, and likeness; has interfered with CMG’s ability to license General Patton’s name, image, and likeness for use in other video games; and has damaged CMG’s ability to enforce its rights to General Patton’s name, image, and likeness against third parties. [read post]