Search for: "(JOHN DOE) HUNG" Results 141 - 160 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 4:59 am by SHG
And how does one guarantee a conviction when that’s the outcome needed? [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 5:48 pm by Steve Graham
  Does I-502 ask for too much of a sacrifice from medical cannabis patients? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:29 am by Raffaela Wakeman
” The AP also has a story on Panetta’s remarks, as does The Hill. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 7:06 am by Ana Popovich
“Each count carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison,” and “a sentencing date is expected to be set at a hearing on the three hung charges next week. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:53 am
 The Chicago case does present that issue squarely, but again the law goes far beyond Cleveland's, and comes close to an outright ban on possession of most guns. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 4:20 am by SHG
  It even made it to mainstream, primetime TV when Starsky and Hutch hung with their uptown snitch, Huggy Bear. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 5:09 am
Maybe a jury will understand.But what about the next guy who does the same thing that Jones did? [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:37 am
 The effect of those on jury trials is becoming notorious, as this article demonstrates: The first mistrial Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge John Russo declared in his courtroom wasn't because of a hung jury, improperly admitted evidence or a procedural error. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:27 am by Abbe R. Gluck
Chief Justice John Roberts began with a series of hypotheticals about speeding tickets — e.g., could a driver going 70 MPH in a 55-MPH zone claim he knew the speed limit but be let off the hook because he thought it should be higher because he was driving on open roads in Montana? [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
So this cautionary possibility does not hold them back either. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am by Lissa Griffin
Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, seemed to think that the defendant’s refusal to agree to joinder under Virginia law was effectively a waiver. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:12 am by Lyle Denniston
  Does the reasonable expectation of privacy trump that fact? [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 12:27 pm
This time, so does the honor of the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Gordon Todd
  That does not appear to have panned out, as the overwhelming majority of super PAC funds have come from individuals. [read post]