Search for: "*king v. U. S"
Results 141 - 160
of 572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
That's the decision he's telling us he's already made. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
Both of these adjustments are based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) published by the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
King v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
As the UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency warned advertisers, “By incorporating advertising from recognized brands the website administrator attempt[s] to make the site appear legitimate. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:31 am
Generally speaking, it is the former, as Schor v Spadaro 2020 NY Slip Op 30668(U) February 26, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 525714/2018 Judge: Peter P. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
McBride v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Today’s second argument is in Opati v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
– and supporting the UN Security Council’s credibility and effectiveness. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am
Leak v RBI Assoc., Ltd 2020 NY Slip Op 50072(U) Decided on January 14, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Fisher, J. is the story of cupidity, stupidity and criminality. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:29 am
Here, in Sutherland v Fitzpatrick 2020 NY Slip Op 30029(U) January 2, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 2090/2018 Judge: Lara J. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
” Upon her response of “ok,” Anderson sent the message: “When you arrived I wanted to do u,” and this emoji: United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm
Kappos, 561 U. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 7:27 am
S. 302 (2014); FDA v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:58 am
An Act (52 Stat. 351; 5 U. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
Plumbing Corp. v Parklot Holding Co., 44 Misc 3d 1218(A) [Sup Ct Kings County 2014]). [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
Id.; King, 563 U.S. at 455. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:32 am
That’s 250 cases every day. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
Therefore, “[u]nchallenged findings of fact are binding on appeal. [read post]
