Search for: "*u. S. v. Edwards" Results 141 - 160 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
The court also rejected Cooke’s objection to the admittance of unrelated emails, including some to an alleged 16-year-old, saying Cooke’s response (“that’s cool that ur young, but i don’t want u to narc”) was further evidence of his propensity and not hearsay. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
  For those who do not have time, the short version is that the court rejected three distinct arguments: that the government violated Edwards by questioning the defendant without counsel present in the aftermath of his capture, that the defendants’ trio of subsequent written waivers of his Miranda and prompt-presentment rights were invalid, and that the government violated the 5th and 6th amendments by preventing defendant’s counsel from locating him after his… [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
In light of the Supreme Court decision this week in Kimbrough v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
They made a U-turn and circled back to the park. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:34 am
Co., 4 NY3d 332 [2005]).That brings us to the present case, the facts of which may be gleaned from New York County Supreme Court Justice Edward Lehner's decision on motions (2007 NY Slip Op 32384[U]). [read post]