Search for: "*u.s. v. Wiley"
Results 141 - 160
of 399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2015, 2:09 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:52 am
The case is Sipuel v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:27 pm
(quoting Adams v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:19 pm
The court relied on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
But while the Costco suit was under way, the Supreme Court held in 2013, in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, that the first sale doctrine also applies to copies of protected works lawfully manufactured abroad. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
The case then went back to the district court for a determination of damages – but in the meantime, the Court decided the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:16 am
., U.S., its possessions and Canada) 4. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:16 am
., U.S., its possessions & Canada) 4. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:16 am
., U.S., its possessions and Canada) 4. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:16 am
., U.S., its possessions and Canada) 4. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:18 pm
After the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
Madison,[111]5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) plausible, even if controversial, and made the decision in Cooper v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Madison,[1]5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)· Cooper v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans,[1] 517 U.S. 620 (1996) (equal protection limitations)· City of EastLake v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
U.S., 488 U.S. 361 (1988)· Whitman v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]