Search for: "-CJS Waite v. Thompson" Results 141 - 160 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2010, 6:14 am by abiinniss
Certainly it is to be hoped that Caribbean leaders in the legal field and in government will not wait for the gates of perdition to be opened upon our society before embracing Alternative Dispute Resolution. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Hall
Thompson, which asks whether cities can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for failure to train personnel, based on a single so-called Brady violation — a reference to Brady v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:16 am by Bennett Capers
(Actually, I toyed with the idea of writing about the Court’s decision in Berghius v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:12 am
It's not often that any court gets to consider the basis on which pecuniary remedies for breach of an obligation of confidentiality are assessed, which is why Vercoe, Pratt and MAS Corporation Limited v Rutland Fund Management Limited and others [2010] EWHC 424 (Ch), a decision last month from Mr Justice Sales, in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, is so gripping.In this action Vercoe and Pratt sought compensation for breach of contract, confidence and fiduciary duty against a… [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:12 am by Steve Hall
The Court's 4-3 ruling in Weis v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:38 pm by Jon Sands
Thompson, No. 07-50351 (12-3-09). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Our initial thought, since our post was six months after Thompson was decided, was "how could the world miss this? [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:02 pm
 but they do not use an equivalent associational justification to accept a claim of retaliation based on association (Thompson v. [read post]