Search for: "-KSC Best v. Au"
Results 141 - 160
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
The wording of independent claim 1 of the main request was as follows (board’s labelling): (i) A superconducting wire comprising: (ii) a tubular sheath member (2); and (iii) an oxide superconductor (1) filled in said sheath member, (iv) said sheath member being formed of a material resistant in an oxidizing atmosphere to oxidation at the temperature of heat treatment used to form said superconducting wire, (v) said material being selected from Au, Ag or an alloy thereof and… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
Au contraire my friends. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:20 am
Burke et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:56 am
Au revoir, auf Wiedersehen, Tschüs, ciao, adios, and bye y'all! [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:23 pm
Following unsuccessful attempts au naturel, they may have tried IVF for 15 years. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:58 am
Beschwerde beim BGer erhob.Das BGer entschied zunächst, dass der Vorsteuerabzug grundsätzlich zu gewähren sei (E. 3.4).Sodann kam das BGer aber zum Schluss, dass die Vorinstanz zu Recht eine Steuerumgehung angenommen habe und dass der Vorsteuerabzug aus diesem Grund zu verweigern sei. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia: In the case of Shiels v Manny ([2012] ACTCA 22) the Australian Capital Territories Court of Appeal increased the award of damages in an libel case from Aus$20,000 to 50,000. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am
Bienvenu Mbuto Mondondo, a Congolese national studying in Brussels, filed suit to obtain an injunction against the continued publication, distribution and sale of the comic book Tintin in the Congo (Tintin au Congo), as well as seeking to have the book withdrawn from bookshops and libraries in Belgium. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Connections back to Best Cellars case: Taco Cabana says TM can cover design and layout of a restaurant. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Supreme Court, including the Virginia v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
IALS, London. 22 March 2012, Nominent Annual UK Internet Policy Forum, Park Plaza, Westminster Bridge, London. 23 March 2012, Butterworths’ IP and Media in the Digital Age, London. 23 March 2012, 9:00-16:00, POLIS International Journalism Conference, London School of Economics. 26 March 2012, 18:30: Panel debate – The best of times or worst of times? [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:46 am
In this regard, Perez sought AU$35,000 for the harm to his reputation and AU$50,000 aggravated damages for distress. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:40 am
One of the best parts of being involved with the Clawbies is learning about new blogs, and seeing just how many different legal topics are being blogged about in Canada. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
I thought about this: Are class actions the best way to protect consumers? [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:10 am
Apeldyn Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm
Bandza, In Brief, South Coast Air Quality Management District v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 am
(IPKat) (IPKat) Best global brands v best Facebook brands (IP Whiteboard) Global – Patents Why Google is much better off with the Motorola patents than the Nortel ones (IAM) Nokia to profit from its new NPE friend as MOSAID tells WiLan: “Show us the money.” – UPDATED (IAM) Patent wars in picture form (Patent Baristas) Microsoft meeting with US Ambassador to Brazil regarding politics of Open Document Format (ODF) proposal to ISO (KEI) … [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:31 pm
Comme indiqué dans le précédent billet, la loi institue le principe du droit au premier déposant et non plus au premier inventeur (Sec. 3). [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 12:59 am
BGE 101 V 77 E. 1a S. 79): 5.3.2 In BGE 118 V 107 E. 1b S. 109 wurde im Zusammenhang mit Drogenkonsum Sucht als unbezwingbares Verlangen zur fortgesetzten Einnahme mit Entziehungserscheinungen nach Absetzen, Tendenz zur Steigerung der Dosis, Schäden für Individuum und Gesellschaft charakterisiert. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:25 pm
Juli 2011 hatte das Bundesgericht zu prüfen, ob ein hypothetisches Erwerbseinkommen im Rahmen der berufsvorsorgerechtlichen Überentschädigungsberechnung anrechenbar sei und falls ja, in der Folge kein Anspruch auf Invalidenleistungen aus der beruflichen Vorsorge bestünde. [read post]
