Search for: "2015 Application for Permit to Enter Land"
Results 141 - 160
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2016, 8:34 pm
Chinese internal commentary was not uniformly positive (see, e.g., Jia Xijin, "Legislations for Foreign NGOs; how will the second boot land? [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
Cavalli S.p.A. , 2015 WL 1247065 (C.D. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:35 am
More Blog Posts: Massachusetts Zoning Laws and Construction Permits, Massachusetts Real Estate Lawyer Blog, published May 14, 2015 Massachusetts Court of Appeals Rules that Residents Do Not Own the Homes They Built on Property Leased from Town, Massachusetts Real Estate Lawyer Blog, published August 28, 2015 [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
—The term ‘permanent areas’ means areas on land or water that provide for launch, recovery, and operation of small un-manned aircraft. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm
These rules form the core of the normative framework for extraterritorial application of Norwegian public policy and state power. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 9:33 am
More Blog Posts: Massachusetts Land Court Affirms Denial of Homeowner’s Application for Zoning Variance, Special Permit, Massachusetts Real Estate Lawyer Blog, published August 14, 2015 Massachusetts Appeals Court Allows Homeowners to Operate Commercial Horse Farm on Property, Massachusetts Real Estate Lawyer Blog, published October 26, 2015 [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 5:05 am
Section 2.1 expressed the application of the By-law to all land within the City, unless it is expressly exempted by legislation. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
§ 10101 et seq.) preempt the application of the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] (Pub. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:49 pm
Additionally, the moratorium on the issuance of building permits was an automatic legal consequence of the imposition of a zoning and land use study. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Tort Claims In September, the drainage districts asked the court to enter partial summary judgment in their favor as to the tort claims. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 12:46 pm
The final judgment was entered Dec. 9, 2015, in the Orange County Superior Court presided by Judge Geoffrey T. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:13 pm
The plaintiff, Hunter Ridge, LLC, applied for a subdivision permit from the defendant, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Newtown, seeking to develop a parcel of land that bordered Taunton Lake. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
This section permits the appointment of someone other than the infant's parents as the guardian. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 9:42 pm
Gurba v Community High School District No. 155, 2015 IL 118332 (IL 9/24/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Preemption [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
Indeed, local agencies are (and always have been) free to establish ministerial schemes for granting land use permits – so long as they comply with CEQA in initially enacting such ordinances – and once such laws are in place vested rights may be obtained through reasonable reliance on ministerially granted permits without any need to further comply with CEQA prior to their issuance. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
California State Lands Commission (September 17, 2015, A141696, A141697) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 10:05 pm
Download the application form, and apply by midnight Pacific Time on November 15, 2015 For more for information on application requirements and timeline, visit the GGF website. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 7:47 pm
It is well-established that a licensee is "one who enters upon or occupies lands by permission, express or implied, of the owner, or under a personal, revocable, non-assignable privilege from the owner, without possessing any interest in the property, and who becomes a trespasser thereon upon revocation of the permission of the privilege". [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
A couple of weeks ago our dear blogmeister Jeremy addressed the British Group of the Union of European Practitioners in Intellectual Property in the convivial setting of The Royal Overseas League on this topic. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 10:54 pm
Under the terms of the covenant that the prior owners of plaintiff’s land entered into, the owners of the parcel were required, to ensure that “all open views from points off the premises to Oyster Bay shall remain in their present unobstructed state. [read post]
