Search for: "3D Construction v. Old Standard"
Results 141 - 160
of 214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
Lishman (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1288), or a more deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review (as held by Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 7:38 am
Mooney v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
Code Regs., § 15126.4(a)(1)(B); Sacramento Old City Assn. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:47 am
” As best I can tell, there are now exactly seven appeals court decisions from three of the four Departments of the Appellate Division explicitly adopting this rule of construction of contract indemnification provisions to cover intra-party disputes unless otherwise specified in the agreement: In re Part 60 RMBS Put – Back Litig.WSA Group, PE., PC v DKI Eng’g & Consulting USA PC (178 AD3d 1320 [3d Dept 2019])Crown Wisteria, Inc. v… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Alice v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm
Ocean Street Extension Neighborhood Assn. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:06 pm
The court does not believe this construction. . .is supported by [state] case law.Woulfe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
(Durex) v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Why becoming generic might be good for a trade mark (IPKat) Good old days of counterfeiting in Hong Kong? [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
” (Kim v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Indus., Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431, (2005), Ferrari held that the good old "presumption against preemption" trumped congressional intent. 2007 WL 1933129, at *4. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Standard Oil of California, 332 U.S. 301, 314 (1947). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
City of Berkeley (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1329: Development standards waived under density bonus laws were not applicable to a density bonus project because Government Code section 65915 requires a local agency grant waivers or reductions of development standards that “will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a development meeting the criteria” of the density bonus statute, and the City’s code requires the City to grant density… [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 8:05 am
" City of New York, 993 F.3d at 91–92 (quoting Illinois v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 2:04 pm
Save Our Heritage Organisation v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 1:39 pm
City of Rancho Cordova (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 703 and Sacramento Old City Association v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Finally, there’s our old friend, Wetzel v. [read post]
