Search for: "A. C. Roper" Results 141 - 156 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Schlesinger, No. 05-3021 Conviction on a variety of arson and fraud charges is affirmed over claim that 28 U.S.C. section 2461(c)(2005) did not authorize the criminal forfeiture of the proceeds of his mail and wire fraud offenses. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Callahanalso attaches to this Application his Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motionfor Sunmary Judgment (Exhibit C) and the District Court's November 16,2007 MemorandumOpinion and Order denying summary judgment, inter alia, on statute of limitations grounds(Exhibit D), for further amplification of the statute of limitations arguments.Mr. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
Statesville, NC 28625 Phone: (704) 871-0934 Fax: (704) 871-9419 E-mail: esstatesville@nc.easter-seals.org Winston-Salem Easter Seals UCP North Carolina 4407 Providence Lane, Suite C Winston-Salem, NC 27106 Phone: (336) 757-4681 Fax: (336) 757-1382 E-mail: eswinston@nc.easter-seals.org NORTH CAROLINA STATE RESOURCES AGING North Carolina Association of Non-Profit Homes for the Aging, Inc. 3700 National Drive, Suite 218 Raleigh, NC 27612-4842 Phone: (919) 571-8333 Fax: (919) 571-1297 … [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
The debate came to a head in mid-2005 after the Supreme Court held in Roper v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
The debate came to a head in mid-2005 after the Supreme Court held in Roper v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 6:30 pm
§ 16-3-655(C)(I)(2006 Supp). [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 3:42 pm
  Of course, age of the offender has long been afforded constitutional significance: even before Roper, murderers under age 16 were not death-eligible; after Roper, murderers under age 18 are not death-eligible. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 4:10 am
Roper, 918 F.2d 885, 886-87 (10th Cir. 1990)(quoting the same district court passage approvingly and relying on it to hold that a defendant, who it was established at a hearing on a motion to suppress borrowed the rental car in question from the lessee, his common-law wife, and who the rental car company had not authorized to drive the car, had no standing to invoke the Fourth Amendment). [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 9:31 pm
Roper granted relief on a Batson challenge. [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 8:45 pm
Wayne Myers offers Note, Roper v. [read post]