Search for: "A. S. Vs. D. S." Results 141 - 160 of 4,795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Honourable Supreme Court of India, which adjudicated the landmark judgement on S. 3(d) in Novartis AG vs Union of India (Novartis SC judgement) in April 2013 concerning the chronic myeloid leukemia drug, Glivec® (active ingredient imatinib as a mesylate salt) clarified that S. 3(d) does not bar patent protection for all incremental inventions related to chemical and pharmaceutical substances, even though it rejected Novartis’s… [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:45 am by sim1koh2
The respect I was given during my time of incarceration to assure I wasn’t left in the dark, is absolutely the best I’d experienced. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 10:19 am by Chris Castle
§ 115(d)(3)(D)(ix)(I)(cc) is contained in The MLC’s Investment Policy. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 8:37 am by Melody McDonald Lanier
  From those who have been with us since the firm’s inception to the new faces who have recently joined the VS family, each person has played an integral part on this path. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Adam Levitin
(i) The 1940s case is In re Portland Electric Power Co., 97 F.Supp. 877, 880 (D. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:31 am by sim1koh2
The respect I was given during my time of incarceration to assure I wasn’t left in the dark, is absolutely the best I’d experienced. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Abigail Slater
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) unveiled a legislative framework for AI, which mainly focuses on the privacy, national security, and copyright implications of the technology. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 7:25 pm by Mary Anne Peck
Gavin Newsom’s (D) signing of two high-profile bills raising the minimum wage of health care and fast-food workers. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
Al Franken (D-Minn.) in 2011: Let’s not sell out. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:30 pm by Fabian Barth
In fact, it was only following the Court’s judgment in C-264/17 Mensing I that it became clear that the margin scheme applied by Mr Mensing would also cover acquisitions from other EU states. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 5:47 am by Russell Knight
” Illinois divorce courts consider “each party’s contribution to the acquisition, preservation, or increase or decrease in value of the marital or non-marital property” 750 ILCS 5/503(d)(1) It’s not clear why contributions to the marital estate when the parties live apart have any affect on how the court should divide the marital property. [read post]