Search for: "ABC Insurance Company" Results 141 - 160 of 658
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2020, 9:19 am by Katie Culliton
  As you may recall, under the ABC test, an individual is presumed to be an employee unless the company can prove all of the following: That the worker is free from control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in actually performing the work; andThat the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; andThat the worker is… [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Jordan Rothman
* The owner of the famous bar Cheers is suing its insurance company over business interruption coverage. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 27 and Tuesday 28 July 2020, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Jordan Rothman
[ABC News] * Tesla has filed a lawsuit against rival Rivian for allegedly poaching talent and trade secrets. [read post]
And must we choose between (a) dismantling the ABC test and AB 5 and (b) leaving AB 5 in place to require that all gig sector employees be classified as employees? [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am by UKSC Blog
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd… [read post]
As we wrote here, AB5 codified and expanded the “ABC test” adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Elizabeth Hampton
  of an insurance company, special care should be exercised ... [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considers whether the rule against reflective loss bars creditors of a company from claiming directly against a third party for asset-stripping the company. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 1 July 2020, the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Presidential Insurance Company Ltd v Twitz & Anor (Trinidad & Tobago). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am by UKSC Blog
This appeal considers the circumstances in which the UK-domiciled parent company of a multi-national group of companies may owe a common law duty of care to individuals who allegedly suffer serious harm as a result of alleged systemic health, safety and environmental failings of one of its overseas subsidiaries as the operator of a joint venture operation. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 15 June and Tuesday 16 June 2020, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Shagang Shipping Company Ltd (in liquidation) v HNA Group Company Ltd. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International… [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The central issue on this appeal is whether the Respondent acted in breach of any fiduciary duty when US$13 million was transferred from Pioneer Freight Futures Company Limited to a third party shortly before the Company entered into provisional liquidation. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm by Nassiri Law
In that case, the court adopted what’s now called the ABC test to determine whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee. [read post]
22 May 2020, 2:31 pm by Unknown
., a condominium association hired a public adjuster for the claims process and a construction company to conduct estimates and repairs after the condominiums sustained hail damage.[7] After a dispute over the amount of the claims paid, the association sued the insurers for breach of contract, among other claims.[8] The insurers counterclaimed, alleging fraud and civil conspiracy against the association, the public adjuster, and the construction company.[9] In its… [read post]
20 May 2020, 10:39 am by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
Employees of companies with more than 500 employees are not eligible (though such companies may have paid leave rules they would be obligated to honor). [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International… [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:53 am by Joy Waltemath
The rideshare companies cannot meet A.B. 5’s “ABC” test, the plaintiffs contend. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Duval v 11-13 Randolph… [read post]