Search for: "ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. US "
Results 141 - 160
of 3,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 11:51 am
Conclusion Advances in AI technology have tremendous potential for both creative and infringing uses. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
For example, when research agendas are being primarily set by external funding schemes and not the free choices of the researchers; when those funding schemes tend to fund the fashionable topics of the times, thereby potentially stifling rather than advancing sciences; when seeking to make research culture generate more and so-called ‘more useful’ results leads in fact to constraining rather than to advancing critical and original thought. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
”[9] This case highlights the fascinating intersection of law, technology, and creativity. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 7:09 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:17 am
” Cites to Perfect 10 v. ccBill, LW v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
” Data-minimization standards do not act as a ban on the use of training data and prompt data for the development of commercial GenAI technology and tools. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
In this review, we use several sources for the cohort: (1) the civil business-fraud case brought against Trump, his family members, and his businesses by the New York Attorney General; (2) the 2020 “Kraken” King v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
If a firm fails to meet this requirement, it shall make contributions to the disabled employment security fund (which is used to support the employment and livelihood of disabled persons). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
This predicament arises from the widespread adoption of advanced technology, which diminishes the time required to accomplish billable tasks. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
The contract, which has been awarded to US spytech firm, Palantir, has been awarded to help reduce the backlog of patients waiting for care. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
” The court questions how the law advances these goals. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:33 am
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
The case, Dada v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 12:47 pm
The discussion focused on Bill 25, which adapts and modernizes the regulatory framework protecting personal information to the new challenges created by advances in the digital and technological environment. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 3:39 am
The Bill defines AI to mean: ‘technology enabling the programming or training of a device or software to: perceive environments through the use of data; interpret data using automated processing design to approximate cognitive abilities; and make recommendations, predictions or decisions; with a view to achieving a specific objective. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 3:35 pm
Tims v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:08 am
For example, in Rosalba Alassini v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
S. 3(d) mandates heightened standards of patentability for these technologies with an objective to prevent evergreening. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 3:41 am
Additionally, defining an invention functionally may allow the claim scope to adapt to future technological advances that arise after the patent filing date, as long as the new technologies perform the claimed function. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 10:45 am
In a recent decision from British Columbia, Dove v. [read post]
