Search for: "AGREE REALTY CORPORATION"
Results 141 - 160
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2011, 7:41 pm
In today’s case, the SCOV looked into the shuffling of property between Stowe Mountain Club, LLC, Mount Mansfield Company, and Spruce Peak Realty, LLC, all of which are wholly owned or controlled by their parent corporation American International Group (AIG). [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 3:27 am
The circuit court agreed and dismissed the petition. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
Through one of his corporate entities, Rooks purchased an old school building on Broadway Street in Grand Rapids. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that corporate officers did not personally agree to arbitrate and were not bound by an arbitration agreement. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:49 am
., “do not rise to the level of corporate dysfunction required for judicial dissolution. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:48 am
The ownership structure consisted of two corporations owned 50/50 by the two families, one to hold title to the realty and the other to operate the club. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:44 am
I’ve seen similar provisions in shareholder, partnership, and LLC agreements permitting owners to engage in competitive operations, but almost always involving realty-holding firms. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
Attorney's fees -- Appeals -- Jurisdiction -- Non-final orders -- An order finding entitlement to attorney's fees but not setting an amount is a non-final, non-appealable order -- Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdictionKLING CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellants, vs. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
Sometimes it’s because one of the two personally or through a separate company owns the realty leased by the co-owned company. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
Rivera, who practices in his law firm’s Plantation office, heads the firm’s real estate and corporate practice group. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
Rivera, who practices in his law firm’s Plantation office, heads the firm’s real estate and corporate practice group. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
Rivera, who practices in his law firm’s Plantation office, heads the firm’s real estate and corporate practice group. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:42 pm
Too bad it took financial collapse to get it done.To find out if a dealer near you is on the "you've been chopped" list, check out the Wall Street Journal's list posted here: [online.wsj.com]If that link doesn't work, try here: [msnbcmedia.msn.com]Meanwhile, if you've got a Chrysler with defects, a Dodge that won't run, or a Jeep that won't beep, you better get it back to your dealer right away and try to get warranty work done while they are still around.The… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
Oasis West Realty, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 3:29 am
Advance Realty Group, LLC (read here). [read post]
20 May 2013, 2:45 am
There are numerous cases unlike Sunburst, such as Matter of Capizola, 2 AD2d 843 (2d Dept 2003) and Matter of Pickwick Realty, Ltd., 246 AD2d 863 (3d Dept 1998), where the courts gave effect to share ownership as reflected in a corporation’s K-1s which, after all, are signed and filed with the IRS under pain of potential civil and criminal penalties for misinformation. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:22 am
Capital Corporate Campus, LLC (BACCC) as the development entity, with SET agreeing to contribute land and improvements, and BADC agreeing to market and manage the development. [read post]
Court Rejects Oppressed Shareholder’s Bid for Dissolution or Buy-Out, Finds Money Damages Sufficient
5 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
Each of the remaining four brothers, Nedal, Samir, Omar, and Kamal, agreed to buy out Jamal’s interest. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:29 am
The plaintiff argued, and the lower court agreed, that under a “nominee agreement” with the trust produced by the plaintiff he maintained an interest in the stock and therefore remained entitled to seek a fee award. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 10:57 am
The Court held that — at least in the context of this type of arrangement — a corporate owner could was a third-party beneficiary who could sue: We certainly agree that as a general proposition, a corporate parent is not a third-party beneficiary of its subsidiary’s contract merely by virtue of their relationship. [read post]
