Search for: "ALL UNKNOWN OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY" Results 141 - 160 of 1,047
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  In 1928, a group of White property owners prepared a new racially restrictive covenant to bind homeowners on the both sides of Thirteenth Street in the block containing the Willson rowhouses. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:53 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
And it’s not really joint ownership in the real property sense b/c there is always a way out of joint ownership—severance to turn it into tenancy in common, which limits the costs that holdout joint owners can impose on each other. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:33 pm by The Murray Law Firm
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 11:11 am by Unknown
That is a factor unknown to the property owner and to the city at the time the “pick one program” decision is being made. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 12:32 pm by The Murray Law Firm
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:59 am by freddy
Generally speaking, a property owner would have no liability if a trespasser was injured on their property. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
This Court has taken a different tack, allowing these cases to proceed under what it believes should be a non-controversial theory: this Court does not have the authority to act as a gatekeeper barring otherwise valid copyright owners access to the courts simply because of the distasteful content of their intellectual property or how it was acquired. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by The Murray Law Firm
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:14 am by The Murray Law Firm
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
A complaint from the Campaign Legal Center says Daniel Defense violated federal law when it gave the money to the Gun Owners Action Fund because federal contractors are barred from making contributions to federal candidates or committees. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
Many platforms already incorporate this clause into their terms and conditions, but not all do. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:26 am by The Murray Law Firm
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 1:41 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Another unknown: How much do those lawsuits actually cost insurers? [read post]
30 May 2022, 11:41 am by The Murray Law Firm
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. [read post]
26 May 2022, 12:09 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Chimène Keitner
  Senior U.S. officials have expressed an interest in making some or all of these assets available to Ukraine, and numerous observers have put forward proposals for doing so over the past several weeks. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:16 am by John McFarland
He swore that the names or residences of the listed defendants were unknown and could not be ascertained after diligent inquiry. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
”) My purpose here is to respond to all of those domestic law objections. [read post]