Search for: "AMENDMENT OF RULES 2, 4, 7 AND 8 OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO PRACTICE OF LAW"
Results 141 - 160
of 218
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
You have a Fifth Amendment Right to remain silent. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:59 am
(1) The facility must inform the resident both orally and in writing in a language that the resident understands of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:41 pm
If there is discovery not answered, do a motion to compel (except with requests for admissions). 4. [read post]
28 May 2012, 8:58 am
Id. at *2.Issue(s): “We must decide whether the Confrontation Clause or the Federal Rules of Evidence prohibit the government from introducing at trial a defendant’s admissions to a police officer because the translator who facilitated them, while conversationally fluent, would not qualify as a court interpreter. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:09 am
Rule 803(8) Similarly, the tape is admissible under Rule 803(8) because Commissioner McGahn's statement reflects the FEC's factual finding that there would be no reason to delay the audit to await an amended report from the campaign following the jury's verdict in this case. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 5:43 pm
Rule #7: Do NOT be in a hurry. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
[4] Appeal proceedings are a judicial procedure (see e.g., Case Law Book, 6th Edition, page 821 VII.E.1), which is governed by the RPBA. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
If your command of German is not sufficient and you do not want to wait for the official translation, well, here is mine:*** Translation of the German original ***[1] The appeal is admissible […].[2] First of all [the Board] has to examine which legal norms are to be applied, how they relate to each other and to which extent they are binding on the Boards.[2.1] The entitlement to represent [parties] in proceedings before the EPO is above all governed by A 134.… [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
§ 102(b)(2). [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:21 pm
Public reporting will expand beyond hospitals to Physician Compare,4 Nursing Home Compare,5 Home Health Compare,6 and Dialysis Compare,7 similar sites to Hospital Compare. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
The Commission has looked and issued papers about multi-jurisdictional practice, rules revisions, outside ownership of law firms, admission by motion, chioce of conflicts law, and other cutting edge issues. 7. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The relevant extracts from the judgment are reproduced hereinbelow;8. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:53 am
(2) Before ordering the production or admission of evidence of a victim’s records or communication, the military judge shall conduct a hearing. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Decisions dealing with costs 7. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:40 am
The request for special notice shall be accompanied by a verified statement of the person’s interest. (2) For purposes set forth in paragraphs (2), (4) to (6), inclusive, (8), (12), (16), (20), and (21) of subdivision (b) of Section 17200, an interested person may petition the court for an order for special notice of proceedings involving a trust. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:28 am
’” I.S., supra, 202 N.J. at 165 (quoting In re Guardianship of J.C., 129 N.J. 1, 7-8 (1992)). [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:26 pm
. ($676,038). 2. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
E.19, as amended, with respect to an Order issued by the Director, Ministry of the Environment, on July 29, 2009, under sections 18, 132 and 196 of the Environmental Protection Act, regarding the operation of a paper mill located at 550 Shipyard Road, City of Thunder Bay, District of Thunder Bay, Ontario; and In the matter of a Hearing held on June 2, 3, 8, 9 and 24, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in the Martin Room, City Hall, 500 Donald Street East, Thunder Bay, Ontario. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
On the one hand, the important role of the technically qualified members already follows from the wording of the law, i.e. from the rules governing the composition [of the Boards] pursuant to A 21 (two or three technically qualified members vs. one or two legally qualified members). [read post]
