Search for: "Abbott v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 925
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Although medical and scientific developments make viability a moving target, in the United States, fetuses are deemed viable after 24 weeks gestation due to a combination of biological and technological factors—almost four full months after the abortion cut-off in SB 8.Texas Governor Greg Abbott says that pregnant women have six weeks to decide whether to seek an abortion. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:12 am by Radhi Shah (USC Gould School of Law)
28 U.S.C § 1498 (a) (Governmental Use) The United States (U.S.) does not have any provisions for a compulsory license. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
United States 21-171Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 11:31 am by Scott Bomboy
However, the President or Congress can exercise considerable powers at ports of entry to the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
End Citizens United had alleged Scott and the New Republican PAC, a group he formerly chaired, violated election laws prohibiting coordination between candidates and outside groups. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Notably, their application has been denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 12:06 am by Mark Summerfield
  The United States will not follow our lead – there are Constitutional, statutory and procedural barriers to permitting US patent applications naming non-human inventors. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 12:06 am by Mark Summerfield
  The United States will not follow our lead – there are Constitutional, statutory and procedural barriers to permitting US patent applications naming non-human inventors. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Because it interferes with the United States' "broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration," Arizona v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Mila Sohoni
United States, the Court addressed an analogous regulatory setup. [read post]