Search for: "Acosta v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
Acosta, 612 So. 2d 1361, 1363 (Fla.1992). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am
Steve also stated that consumer education (e.g. [read post]
17 May 2019, 7:04 am
” The case is United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
The decision in Acosta v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 7:04 am
” The case is United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 1977 Abood v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 1977 Abood v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:13 am
Supp 3d at 1309 (holding that although mortgagors’ prior defaults on their mortgages constituted material breaches, SunTrust waived those breaches by continuing with the mortgage contracts); Cf., Acosta v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:02 am
Acosta, 80 NY2d 665). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:53 am
Code § 1030(c)(2)(B)(ii), which states that the punishment for an offense under 18 U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
We can’t revive expired criminal SOLs, according to the Supreme Court in Stogner v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
(It's interesting to note that two of the three judges in the majority, Justices Saxe and Acosta, were on the panel that decided the Littman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 2:46 pm
United States Sugar Corp. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
How do you measure the risk of freedom of expression v. copyright takedowns? [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Acosta v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
