Search for: "Action for a Clean Environment v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
Baker v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 11:01 am
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:13 am
” Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 6:45 am
In the Netherlands (Urgenda Foundation v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm
Fifth Circuit: It is, notwithstanding Justice Alito's suggestion in Reed v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
California et al. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm
Stephen ReillyAndrew JonesData breach class action lawsuits are already well-established in the United States, but are only developing elsewhere. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Both policies at issue in DNC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Wilde v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In Bliss v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Suction dredge miners are required to obtain a NPDES permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
[so that e]ssentially, [SB 396 is] ‘code cleaning. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE City of Oakland v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:39 pm
On June 12th, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, filed its decision in Golden Door Properties LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 3:37 am
Mosley v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:21 pm
Mosley v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 8:43 am
That agency, the court explained, is better positioned to determine whether the plant’s actions constitute a public nuisance and create an unreasonably unsafe work environment. [read post]
