Search for: "Amendment to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration"
Results 141 - 160
of 569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
Shatzer and Florida v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 4:44 am
Perhaps there is a legal explanation.At 945 So.2d 16( Fla. 2007) (Blog note- this maybe the very first time in over 700 posts we have actually published a cite) The Florida Supreme Court on April 5, 2007 issued an emergency amendment to the rules of Judicial Administration requiring that before a non-criminal record is sealed, the following procedures are followed:1. [read post]
3 May 2012, 11:56 am
The petitions of the day are: Florida v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:07 am
The State claimed that the Florida Rule o [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (covering Alabama, Georgia, and Florida), which had held that such testimony lacks First Amendment protection as speech pursuant to “official duties” when it concerns the employees’ job responsibilities. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:00 pm
(Click here for a local news report on the ruling.) [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
” In California, as elsewhere, when it is applicable, the business judgment rule.[8] precludes judicial second-guessing of decisions made by corporate fiduciaries in good faith or where the decision can be attributed to any rationale business purpose.[9] The rule is procedural and process oriented. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:26 am
The Florida Constitution says otherwise. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:26 am
I had intended to address Douglas next, as it is a nice gateway for discussing Florida v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
The fact that a state statute authorizes capital punishment does not conclusively establish the punishment's constitutionality because the Eighth Amendment is a limitation on both legislative and judicial action. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Burris, The Administrative Process and Constitutional Principles: Separation of Powers, 75 FLORIDA BAR J. 28 (2001) (emphasis added). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:22 am
Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
" "The judicial officer may contribute to the improvement of the legal system and the administration of justice by assisting law schools in recruiting the most qualified individuals into the legal profession. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
But Garland’s judicial record contains a decision in which he took a strong stand in favor of newsgathering protections. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:57 am
No Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am
No Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
Additional coverage comes from Bill Mears at Fox News, who reports that “[t]he 5-3 decision comes as the Trump administration looks to shore up rules governing those seeking permanent entry into the country. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:27 am
No Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:55 am
Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am
This argument confuses and conflates the “Manner” of appointing presidential electors—popular election—with underlying rules of election administration. [read post]
