Search for: "Amendment to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure" Results 141 - 160 of 529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
In comparison, the rules which were deemed arbitrary and capricious either did not go through this procedure at all, or a substantial and inseverable part did not. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
Kavanaugh was later a partner at the law firm Kirkland & Ellis, where he specialized in appellate law. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Welcome
Circuit Court, 4th Judicial Circuit (Appellate) in and for Duval County. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:07 am by MBettman
On appeal, the Third District, in a unanimous opinion, reversed the trial court’s ruling which found Ohio’s 1993 death penalty statute unconstitutional under the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Brown, 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Brown 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
At the Maryland Appellate Blog, Michael Wein looks at a decision from the U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Each year our Year in Review comments on significant securities-related decisions by the Supreme Court, federal appellate courts and district courts, notes key developments in SEC enforcement, and summarizes significant rulings in state law fiduciary litigation against directors and officers of public companies. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:43 am by MBettman
On appeal, the Third District, in a unanimous opinion, reversed the trial court’s ruling which found Ohio’s 1993 death penalty statute unconstitutional under the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
” Usually referred to as Collection Appeal Procedure (“CAP”). [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Then earlier this year, the Florida Supreme Court in the per curiam ruling of In re: Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code, decided NOT to adopt the Daubert standard – even though the legislature had passed a law enacting it – for two reasons: Concerns regarding the constitutionality of the amendment; Procedural concerns with the law creating a section that isn’t part of the state’s evidence code. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 8:42 am by Dean Freeman
Previously, there had been two lines of interpretations on the “relate back doctrine” (Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.190) in the state’s appellate courts. [read post]