Search for: "Amendments To The Florida Family Law Rules Of Procedure (Notice)"
Results 141 - 153
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2009, 4:01 pm
Weekly D1604aBlood sample -- In action against defendant whose car collided with decedent's car when defendant passed out while driving, trial court departed from essential requirements of law in granting plaintiff's request to test, for the presence of a prescription cough medication, the surviving portion of defendant's blood sample which had been given to law enforcement to be analyzed for alcohol content and the presence of controlled substances -- Request to… [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:14 am
Weekly D795aAttorney's fees -- Claim or defense not supported by material facts or applicable law -- Administrative law judge erred in awarding attorney's fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes, to party who did not comply with mandatory notice provisions of statute -- Counsel's letter to opposing counsel threatening to seek attorney's fees under section 57.105 was not the same as the statutorily required motion, which is required to be… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:24 am
The Florida Supreme Court released the following court rule opinions:Opinions Released Mar. 19, 2009SC08_1612 - In re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile ProcedureSC08_2176 - In re: Approval of Application for Determination of Indigent Status Form For Use By Clerks and Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.984Opinions Released Mar. 5, 2009OP_SC08_1488 - In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal… [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:20 pm
The Florida Supreme Court in 1992 ruled blood banks are not covered by malpractice laws because they do not provide treatment or care to blood recipients. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
SC08-___ BILL McCOLLUM, Attorney General of the State of Florida, and, WALTER A. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:09 am
DeCarr and her family moved from that residence over ayear before, weeks after Lisa disappeared. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Mejia, No. 052856, 056683, 061744 Convictions for conspiracy to commit assaults with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence are vacated where: 1) the testimony of the Government expert witness violated the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment; and 2) that error was not harmless. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
Davi, No. 05-20803 An order enjoining California and Florida from applying their licensing and regulatory requirements on a Texas-based real estate broker is reversed and dismissed where: 1) personal jurisdiction over California did not arise from merely having sent cease and desist orders to the Texas Real Estate Commission; and 2) personal jurisdiction over Florida did not arise from the state's contact with the Texas Attorney General's Office in order to obtain… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Lopez-Matias, No. 07-1662 An order striking a Notice of Intent to Sentence of Death is vacated where: 1) the U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Page, No. 06-3800 A conviction for conspiracy to import cocaine and marijuana is affirmed over a claim that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(G) by not informing defendant of, and making sure he understood, the nature of the charge to which he pled guilty. . [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
The Florida Supreme Court has ruled numerous times that it finds no constitutional bar to death by lethal injection. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
The Roots of the Law, Where they are Found and Best Illustrated in Both the Old and the Latest Cases, the Great Maxims, General Principles and Leading Cases, the Six Leading Subjects in Miniature: Equity, Procedure, Contract, Crime, Tort and Construction... [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-16, was denied on the ground that there was no lawful rationale for proceeding ex parte, rather than on notice to (a) the students, and (b) the university.Legal challenges to ex parte discovery procedure.The ex parte discovery process is being challenged in the Boston University case, in Boston, Massachusetts, where a motion to quash and vacate has been made in Arista v. [read post]
