Search for: "American Trading & Production Corp. v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2013, 7:39 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, in Sunbeam Television Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
Forest Laboratories, Inc. turns law of declaratory judgment on its head: (Patent Docs), (Patent Baristas), Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) – Roche appeals preliminary injunction barring US sales of Mircera in patent infringement battle with Amgen: (Philip Brooks), (IP Law360), Norvasc (Amlodipine) – Ranbaxy becomes first foreign generic company to develop a generic product independently outside Japan and receive authorization from MHLW-Japan:… [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
The PSC argues that the cost of translation should be considered reasonable cost of doing business in the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Center for American Progress report a mixed bag of recommendations to Obama Administration (Patent Docs) Manufacturing letter on patent reform to President Obama (Anticipate This!) [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
United States (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) (IPBiz) (IPBiz) (PatLit) CAFC: Another means-plus-function opinion: General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Early on, however, the American bench and Bar seemed to reach an uneasy stalemate about the contours of the debate regarding corporate social responsibility. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC… [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP finance) Global - Copyright A bit about derivative works (Ip's What's Up) Australia Singapore Treaty takes effect March 2009 (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Capital allowances: business related costs – business transfer arrangement establishing right to intellectual property (IP Down Under) Droit de suite scheme introduced into Parliament (International Law Office) Interlocutory relief partially granted in Sebel Furniture Limited… [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:01 pm
See American Circuit Breaker Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Electrosante; Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Electrosante; Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Federal-Mogul Corp (Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: Plaintiff’s choice of forum for false marking claims given little weight where Plaintiff was formed specifically to pursue litigation: Unique Product Solutions, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:54 pm
Nat’l Foreign Trade Council, 530 U.S. 363, 373 (2000); see also ASCAP v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§ 102(b)(3) consistent with existing trade secret law.[21] Under trade secret law, trade secrets are often defined in terms of whether information has been made available to the public through distribution of a completed product.[22] In essence, if a member of the public can readily reverse engineer a product such that the underlying technology, method, or method of manufacture can be understood, there is no trade secret… [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The first is the substantial change in the direction of U.S. policy in trade and globalization. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
Google Corp., 2020 WL 4905573 (N.D. [read post]
