Search for: "Ames et al v. Ames et al"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2022, 2:26 pm
From the per curiam in today's Tucker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 3:26 pm
If there is any question about the legal conclusions in this post, a very similar California statute enacted as Assembly Bill 979 was found unconstitutional earlier this year for the same equal protection flaw, in Robin Crest, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:34 am
See Brief for African-American Organization et al. as Amici Curiae 14–21. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:25 am
In any event, Roberts and (possibly) Kavanaugh are not on the same page as Rehnquist, et al. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:38 pm
Human rights counter-diplomacy, on the other hand, is aimed at undermining human rights protections and is employed ‘for the simple purpose of maintaining power and privilege or out of an unwillingness to confront prejudice and bigotry’ (O’Flaherty et al. 2011, p.30). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
The case is entitled Hooks et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:15 am
The second challenge is that human rights – while often referred to the defining idea of our time – are usually not self-fulfilling and are often susceptible to symbolic rather than substantive politics (Langford et al., 2015, Chapter 15). [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm
The Justices of that Court, however, would probably be the first to disclaim any credibility on the causes of any disease.[3] The authors further distort the notion of signature diseases by stating that “[v]aginal adenocarcinoma in young women appears to be a signature disease associated with maternal use of DES. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
Mgmt Properties IV, LLC et al, 2022 WL 2079716, at *5 (S.D. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:55 pm
Gabet et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 7:27 am
[3] 10A Steven Plitt, et al., Couch on Insurance 3d §149:34. (1995 updated 2019) [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
Contractors Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:46 am
LaToya Cantrell et al., (5th Cir., March 24, 2022). [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:46 am
LaToya Cantrell et al., (5th Cir., March 24, 2022). [read post]
16 May 2022, 1:47 pm
Gabet et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In American Needle, the Court stripped the National Football League of Section 1 immunity by holding that the NFL is not entitled to the single entity defense under Copperweld and instead, its conduct must be analyzed under the “flexible” rule of reason.[25] And last year, in NCAA v. [read post]
