Search for: "Amy Miller"
Results 141 - 160
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2019, 6:44 am
Nathan, Electoral Consequences of Colonial Invention: Brokers, Chiefs, and Distribution in Northern Ghana Benjamin Barber & Charles Miller, Propaganda and Combat Motivation: Radio Broadcasts and German Soldiers’ Performance in World War II Timm Betz & Amy Pond, Foreign Financing and the International Sources of Property Rights Jack Paine, Democratic Contradictions in European Settler Colonies Margarita H. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
Amy Howe has this blog’s opinion analysis, which first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
28 May 2019, 5:30 am
The pinchedly smiling face of Michelle Miller made me queasy. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Miller said that the move was intended to increase trust between communities of color and law enforcement. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
Judge Amy Berman Jackson, also of the District of Columbia, has likewise ruled on the legality of Mueller’s appointment in Paul Manafort’s now-defunct civil suit against the Justice Department, though not on constitutional grounds. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:28 am
Jack Goldsmith and Washington Post reporter Greg Miller called into the Lawfare Podcast to discuss Miller’s new book, “The Apprentice: Trump, Rusia, and the Subversion of American Democracy. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:35 am
On the Lawfare Podcast, Jack Goldsmith spoke with Washington Post reporter Greg Miller on Miller’s new book, “The Apprentice: Trump, Russia, and the Subversion of American Democracy. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
For this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, Amy Howe covers yesterday’s oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 7:47 am
Miller, Marcine A. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Mark Miller urges the justices to review Marquette County Road Commission v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation Blog, Mark Miller considers the potential impact of Kavanaugh’s appointment “on the Court’s practice and jurisprudence. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:48 am
Amy Howe has this blog’s argument analysis, which first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
Another look at Weyerhaeuser comes from Mark Miller at the Federalist Society Review. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:14 am
District Court Judge Amy Totenberg ruled Georgia need not replace paperless voting machines before the midterm elections, dealing a blow to security activists even as the judge acknowledged the machines are not secure and continuing to use them may infringe on voters’ constitutional right to a free and fair election. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 6:24 pm
Please email Amy Fair at afair@simmonsfirm.com to RSVP. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:29 pm
I'm glad at least that this order has gotten some local press coverage; here's an excerpt from the article by the Palm Desert Sun (Amy DiPierro), which gives something of a backstory: Over the past four years, as Zona wrote [her blog], she began to question parts of her former life that had never made sense. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Wodehouse Zachary Kramer zachary_kramer Arizona State Kris Mayes krismayes Arizona State Steve Clowney steveclowney Arkansas-Fayetteville Property Race & the Law Land Use Steve Clowney steveclowney Arkansas-Fayetteville Property Land Use Brian Gallini profcoachg Arkansas-Fayetteville Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Legal Education Stacy Leeds stacyleeds Arkansas-Fayetteville Property American Indian Law Legal Education Jill Lens… [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:42 am
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Brian Miller suggests that “Kavanaugh’s record of clear and disciplined writing may be one of the most influential traits he brings to the Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(Amy is a patent prosecutor with an MS in bioengineering who recently joined Stanford as a fellow with the Center for Law and the Biosciences—patent folks should meet her!) [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am
In an op-ed at TC Palm, Mark Miller considers how the topic of stare decisis, or adherence to precedent, may come up during the confirmation, noting that “while stare decisis is a vital legal principle, the justices of the Supreme Court have never considered it a non-negotiable command. [read post]
