Search for: "Anderson v. State Bar" Results 141 - 160 of 616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Cities are generally barred by the First Amendment from controlling what demonstrators say. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 7:25 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Starbucks In Hannaford Data Breach Case, First Circuit Says Card Replacement and ID Theft Insurance are Reasonable Mitigation Damages and Compensable–Anderson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 12:42 pm
  SLUSA bars state law fiduciary duty claims if those claims are “in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am by Jacob Schulz
Lenawee County, Michigan, had an apocalyptic Christian nationalist militia problem about a decade ago. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice and the defendants were entitled to dismissal of that cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d at 909; Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d at 728). [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Last week, however, the 7th Circuit may have made hybrid cases more difficult for the plaintiff’s bar in Anderson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
App. 2000) (opinion withdrawn, but its author dissented from the en banc for this reason, 41 S.W.3d at 366-75 [Anderson, J.]). [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:28 am by Katherine Cook
On December 31, 2020, the Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion, adopting the federal court’s summary judgment standard as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Everly, 958 F.3d 442 (6th Cir. 2020) is a case that suggests the possibility of new things: Existing precedents hold that a claim for ownership “accrues only once, and if an action is not brought within three years of accrual, it is forever barred” and this includes claims for authorship. [read post]
Any errors in authorizing a treatment or vaccine for the novel coronavirus could have serious repercussions for the United States’s ability to get the pandemic under control, and for health security more broadly. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am by Grant Tudor
Inherent contempt, or the authority of either chamber to punish nonmembers for obstructing its work, including for defiance of its subpoenas—upheld in early Supreme Court decisions (Anderson v. [read post]