Search for: "Application of Rodgers"
Results 141 - 160
of 241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2011, 9:56 am
Following a hearing, he approved the order subject to the “the important exception that he should refuse JIH’s application to continue Nicol J’s order granting him anonymity – [2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)”. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:20 am
Bill Rodger, 2005-0126 (WIPO June 27, 2005) the Respondent alleged that it had sold the domain name in dispute, but the facts disclosed that the transferee company was not incorporated until after the proceeding was commenced. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
However, much of the Judgment of the Court is orthodox and of continuing application and importance. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
No proof had been offered for the alleged causal link between the applicant’s article and the professor’s death. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Judge Boyle denied the defendants’ motion to declare the Prejudgment Interest Act unconstitutional, rejecting all of the arguments made including the applicability of Judge Maras’s ruling in Hyland, etc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm
And Section 64(1A), in particular, was introduced, in Lord Rodger’s words: to ensure that, in future, instead of being destroyed, samples taken from suspects would be retained indefinitely and so remain available to the police on the national DNA database. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:03 am
Judges in the U.S. are required by federal law to uphold foreign custody orders if they comply with American legal values, but Rodgers argued that no Islamic court could ever meet this criteria.In the second case, a Texas court allowed a couple to mediate a property dispute with a private arbitrator. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 5:32 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am
We understand that the defendant has now issued a strike out application. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:21 pm
In LA, retroactive application of the AWA is a problem. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
Silih v Slovenia (2009) 49 E.H.R.R. 37 – Read judgment, McCaughey and Quinn’s Application [2010] NICA 13 – Read judgment This is Part I of Matthew Hill’s feature. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
Lord Rodger said: “Article 8 and reputation 37 On behalf of the press, Mr Robertson QC did not dispute that article 8 rights fall within the scope of “the rights of others” in article 10(2). [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
Counsel for Greif also argued that the Court of Appeal erred in holding that section 3 of the Act allowed the application of the Fairchild rule of causation in mesothelioma cases. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:06 am
Supreme Court judge Lord Rodger said gay people’s right to live freely must be protected. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Co., 813 F.2d 917, 919-921 (9th Cir. 1987)(complaint constructively filed upon delivery to clerk despite rejection for non-compliance with local rules and filing fee statute); Rodgers v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:17 am
In light of the continued enforcement agency interpretation of the proper application of the statute, it seems appropriate to paraphrase the Rodgers and Hart song, “My Funny Valentine”: “. . . [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:06 am
On 1 September 2010 Morgan J refused the application and indicated that judgment would be given at a later date. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:12 am
Citing Comment 9 to Rule 7.1, the Committee states that “should carefully refrain from giving or appearing to give a general solution applicable to all apparently similar individual problems because slight changes in the fact situations may require a material variance in the applicable situation…” Next, I searched Google Scholar and pulled two articles from the Stanford Law Journal and Duke Law Journal. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm
In the Courts A Strasbourg application by composer Keith Burstein has been dismissed as inadmissible. [read post]
