Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey"
Results 141 - 160
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), a noncapital case. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
New Jersey, 530 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
New Jersey, 530 U. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:27 am
New Jersey and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 2:00 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:07 am
New Jersey, Blakely v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:32 pm
New Jersey and culminated – at least in constitutional terms – with another Justice Stevens opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 1:34 pm
The same goes with the argument that Apprendi v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 1:12 pm
New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451, 453 (1939). [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
New Jersey 544 U.S. 466 (2000) (Any fact, other than a prior conviction, that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
New Jersey, which held that federal juries, rather than judges, must decide any facts leading to enhanced criminal penalties. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:13 am
Further, the petitioner cited the case of Apprendi v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:27 pm
Issue(s): Walker “argues that it was error under Apprendi v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:01 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 3:53 pm
New Jersey (U.S. 2000): Petitioner also contends that the jury instructions led to an Apprendi error[]. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 1:58 am
New Jersey in 2000 SCOTUS issued a string of decisions saying, in essence, that judges can't make factual findings that increase sentences; only juries can do that. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000); Texas v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:33 am
New Jersey line of sentencing cases to allow harsher sentences based upon facts found by a judge, not by the jury. [read post]
