Search for: "Arthur Andersen" Results 141 - 160 of 506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by Geoffrey Rapp
In the Enron scandal that principally motivated the enactment of the SOX protection, for instance, the First Circuit’s interpretation would have permitted accounting firm Arthur Andersen to fire an employee who blew the whistle on fraud by publicly held Enron. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 12:11 am by John Steele
I was familiar with the criticism of the prosecution of Arthur Andersen, but the post goes way beyond that matter. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 8:47 am by Mark S. Humphreys
In the Arthur Andersen case the court held that a reasonable fee must be based on the eight factors set out by the disciplinary rules. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 8:14 am by Jared Klaus
Bringing criminal charges against a company as large as SAC (the fund has 1,000 employees and had roughly $15 billion under management at the beginning of the year) is likely to have ripple effects on employees and the economy.Perhaps the most well-known example of this was when the Justice Department indicted the accounting firm Arthur Andersen in the wake of the Enron scandal in 2002, causing the collapse of the firm and the loss of 28,000 jobs. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:00 am by LindaMBeale
The reason--the lesson from Enron and Arthur Andersen, where thousands of lower-level employees who had no control over corporate actions lost their jobs when the firms collapsed after wrongdoing and charges. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:43 am
[Note: an Arthur Andersen alum pointed out that they actually had this color scheme by in 2002 way before TR or Bloomberg started using it.] [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:16 am by White Collar Crime Prof Blogger
Gabriel Markoff has a piece titled, Arthur Andersen and the Myth of the Corporate Death Penalty: Corporate Criminal Convictions in the Twenty-First Century that is forthcoming in the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, April 2013 issue. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:48 am
However, the Arthur Andersen case and now the Fillpoint case make this position a lot less certain, even though they don't specifically overturn Loral corp. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 6:17 am by Joe Kristan
Going Concern,  Arthur Andersen’s Bones Still Have Some Meat on Them. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:54 am by Kevin F. Brady
Since the demise of Arthur Andersen, however, the Committee has found that the paradigm has totally shifted to the detriment of Ds&Os. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:53 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Gabriel Markoff has posted Arthur Andersen and the Myth of the Corporate Death Penalty: Corporate Criminal Convictions in the Twenty-First Century on SSRN. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:47 am by Lawrence Solum
Gabriel Markoff has posted Arthur Andersen and the Myth of the Corporate Death Penalty: Corporate Criminal Convictions in the Twenty-First Century on SSRN. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by Lawrence Cunningham
These include avoiding the risk of collateral consequences of corporate convictions (such as customer defection and investor withdraws that could ruin a firm, as happened with Arthur Andersen in 2005). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:59 pm by JD Hull
Enron and Arthur Andersen quickly became symbols of unfair play. [read post]