Search for: "Arthur Andersen LLP"
Results 141 - 160
of 180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2008, 5:12 pm
I was just informed that certiorari was granted in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al., v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 11:45 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 7:58 pm
The case of Arthur Andersen LLP, et al., v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:07 pm
Conference of November 7, 2008 __________________ Docket: 08-146 Title: Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:14 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal.4th 937, 81 Cal.Rptr.3d 282, 293, 189 P.3d 285, 295 (2008). [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 7:39 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 189 P.3d. 285, 288 (2008), the Ninth Circuit stated (arguably in dicta) that noncompetition agreements in California are invalid unless necessary to protect an employer’s trade secrets. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, S147190 (Cal. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 5:51 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed California's strong public policy against covenants not to compete. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:39 pm
Raymond Edwards was hired by Arthur Andersen as a tax manager in January 1997. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 5:39 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, No. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 6:20 am
Arthur Andersen, LLP (August 7, 2008) __ Cal.4th __. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 6:47 am
Edwards and against Arthur Andersen. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 8:47 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed California's strong public policy against covenants not to compete. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 5:17 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, the court reminded us that noncompetition agreements are invalid under California's Business and Professions Code section 16600, even if they are written narrowly enough not to deprive persons of their right to pursue their profession. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:43 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed California's strong public policy against covenants not to compete. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
Arthur Andersen LLP today and held that employee non-competition agreements are invalid, even if narrowly drawn, unless the agreement falls within a statutory exception. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:00 am
Arthur Andersen, LLP (2008) __ Cal.4th __. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:03 pm
Arthur Anderson LLP, the California Supreme Court ruled on the following issues: (1) To what extent does Business and Professions Code section 16600 prohibit employee noncompetition agreements; and (2) is a contract provision requiring an employee to release “any and all” claims unlawful because it encompasses nonwaivable statutory protections, such as the employee indemnity protection of Labor Code section 2802? [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:10 pm
Arthur Andersen - read here -The Court flatly rejected the "limited" or "narrow" non-competition agreement as unlawful under Bus. and Prof. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 3:20 pm
Raymond Edwards II was hired as a tax manager by Arthur Andersen LLP. [read post]
