Search for: "Associated Press v. United States Department of Justice" Results 141 - 160 of 1,026
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Cannon adds: “As a function of Plaintiff’s former position as President of the United States, the stigma associated with the subject seizure is in a league of its own. [read post]
§ 793, prohibits “willfully retain[ing]” information “relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation” and “fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it” (emphasis added). [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am by Neil Hamilton and Louis Bilionis
New Interpretation 303-5 states that “professional identity focuses on what it means to be a lawyer and the special obligations lawyers have to their clients and society. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The letter described the alarm in the Justice Department as officials realized how serious the documents were. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
One investigative grand jury is considering “potential fraud associated with the false-electors scheme or with pressure Trump and his allies allegedly put on the Justice Department and others to falsely claim the election was rigged. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Scott Perry’s cellphone was seized as part of the Justice Department’s criminal investigation into the use of fake electors to try to overturn President Biden’s victory. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Justice Department Details Threats Against Election Workers Associated Press News – Marina Villeneuve | Published: 8/3/2022 The U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[5][6] Justice Thomas’s plurality opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
The speech, even if erroneous or knowingly false might fall outside First Amendment protections, especially if they were spoken by an ordinary person, not the President of the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
“No, I’m not going to ask them,” Biden said at a press conference in Madrid. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has more information here. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am by familoo
The current rarity of publication by any FR judge below High Court level does limit the extent of the ‘problem’ for now, as many litigants will just keep a low profile in the hope of avoiding any press interest or publication at all. [read post]