Search for: "Attorney General v. Olson"
Results 141 - 160
of 494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 2:24 pm
It's a version of a recent speech by William Ruckelshaus, describing at length his recollection of his role as acting FBI director, and then Deputy Attorney General, during the Watergate era, including his firing/resignation during the Saturday Night Massacre. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:16 am
This analysis was undertaken by our colleague and esteemed bankruptcy attorney, Richard Olson, of Perkins Olson in Portland, Maine. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm
By similar logic, the House of Representatives could include another article of impeachment if the president subsequently removed an attorney general because he was investigating such an offense. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
They greeted the attorney general verybriefly. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
They greeted the attorney general verybriefly. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
’” United States v. 564.54 Acres of Land, 441 U.S. 506, 510–11 (1979) (quoting Olson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:15 pm
Olson and In Re: Sealed Case? [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Of course, there are exceptions to the attorney client privilege, such as the crime-fraud exception, where legal advice is sought to advance a criminal or fraudulent purpose, but generally one's own attorney is not the one who seeks resort to this exception. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5 (CanLII), [2015] 1 SCR 331 [44] The doctrine that lower courts must follow the decisions of higher courts is fundamental to our legal system. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:33 am
Attorney David Boies and former Solicitor General Ted Olson filed a federal lawsuit against California's marriage amendment, claiming that it violates the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:51 am
Ted Olson left in the summer of 2004. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
Madigan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
The attorney general moved to dismiss on the grounds that all but one of the applicants lacked standing to seek a review. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
Olson that the independent counsel, likewise removable only by the Attorney General for cause, was not an inferior officer because she was not subordinate (read “here-and-now subservient”) to the AG. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:52 am
Perry v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:41 am
Earlier this week, the Appellate Division decided the case of Baker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:41 am
Earlier this week, the Appellate Division decided the case of Baker v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:41 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Jeffrey Pope, Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 11:32 am
Olson went so far as to suggest that, if the courts were considering the case of “Jones v. [read post]
