Search for: "B. H. v. Standard Insurance Company"
Results 141 - 160
of 181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
MORGAN d/b/a SAINTS & SCHOLARS TATTOOS, Appellee. 2nd District.Insurance -- Automobile -- Appraisal -- Attorney's fees -- Where insurer demanded appraisal of stolen vehicle, and insured failed to comply with appraisal clause but filed suit prematurely, insured was not entitled to award of attorney's fees for that phase of trial court proceedings - [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
(b) A health care provider or a referring practitioner may not present or cause to be presented to any individual or third party payor or other entity a claim, bill, or other demand for payment for clinical laboratory services, pharmacy services, radiation therapy services, physical therapy services or x-ray or imaging services furnished pursuant to a referral prohibited by this subdivision. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
If a court can resolve a coverage dispute under the common law and reach the same result provided by the statute, such retrospective analysis would be moot.Although the Act applies only to liability policies issued to construction professionals, because the same, standardized wording is used in policies insuring most other Colorado business risks, the Act’s effects may broadly resonate. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
b. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
Kemp, Paul B. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Title: Cobell v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
(h) Bagbey v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:12 am
(b) That the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established business. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:18 am
With regard to stock options, the most significant change occurred in 1992 with the requirement that stock options be valued at date of grant based on (a) the potential realizable value if stock were to appreciate by certain specified percentages or (b) Black-Scholes or other acceptable model of option valuation. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
” Click Here Railroad Company to Pay $4 Million Penalty for 2005 Chlorine Spill in Graniteville, SC. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
H/t to David Gottlieb and his No-Fault Paradise for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
And worse, the insurance companies that pay for most med-mal defense don’t often want to pay for a lot of legal research of the sort necessary to get their counsel up to speed on this sort of peculiar theory. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:51 pm
LIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A APTUS COMPANY, AND SUNG-PING H. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:09 am
Lin, individually and d/b/a Aptus Company, and Sung-Ping H. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
(5) Health insurance information. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
The clarified standard for rule 12(b)(6) motions adopted here will apply to any amended complaint that the plaintiffs may file.Iannacchino v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
(b) A short mention of what Gardasil is and why it was controversial back in 2006 when it was introduced, for those who haven’t closely followed it. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
AND WILLIAM H. [read post]