Search for: "B. Smith" Results 141 - 160 of 5,333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith, Social Media Regulation in the Wake of 303 Creative v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:25 am
"I'm reading this long NYT article by Glenn Thrush and Adam Goldman, "Inside Garland’s Effort to Prosecute Trump/In trying to avoid even the smallest mistakes, Attorney General Merrick B. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:31 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
Under subsection (b) of the provision, the President may waive this restriction if s/he determines doing so would be in the national interest. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
Under subsection (b) of the provision, the President may waive this restriction if s/he determines doing so would be in the national interest. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
June 20, 2000) (noting that “question of intent is a classic jury question and not one for experts”); Smith v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:40 am by Tom Kosakowski
PytlikZillig, Research Associate Professor and Senior Research Manager, U. of Nebraska Public Policy Centre, and Professor Rodrigo Franco, Professor of Biomedical Sciences and Faculty Ombuds, U. of Nebraska-Lincoln GENERAL PANEL B: STUDENT PRESENTATIONS ON CONFLICT RESOLUTION (Bilingual Panel) •     Art as a Tool for Change in Conflict. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm by admin
As for the authors’ professed concern about “rule of law,” readers should note that the Jurs and DeVito article completely ignores the remedial amendment to Rule 702, which went into effect on December 1, 2023, to address the myriad inconsistencies, and failures to engage, in required gatekeeping of expert witness opinion testimony.[10] The new Rule 702 is now law, with its remedial clarification that the proponent of expert witness opinion must show the court that the opinion is… [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm by Alden Abbott
§45(m)(1)(B)) (see here) authorizes the FTC to seek civil penalties against a company that acted unfairly or deceptively. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
[The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by default judgment) to have committed the assault, but Judge Wilkinson's concurrence argues that, absent this unusual factor, one-sided pseudonymity should be frowned on.] [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm by beng
“Clients hire an attorney for the attorney’s knowledge, experience, and ability to interpret and apply legal precedent,” said Joel Murray , an attorney with McKean Smith in Portland, Oregon. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Central question relates to whether there is substitution—copyright’s bête noire. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Agents often earn a small commission from the works that their principals purchase, while a seller or dealer keeps the difference between what they purchased the work for and what they made off it.[12] B. [read post]