Search for: "BARKER v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2024, 4:19 pm by Micah Belden
State, stating “[a]lthough such a defendant cannot advance a due diligence defense, he has the statutory twenty-day remedy, and in appropriate circumstances, may have a Constitutional speedy hearing claim under Barker v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:45 pm by Kevin Maillard
Contributors include:Matt Fletcher (MSU)Carla Pratt (Penn State)  Rose Cuison Villazor (Hofstra)Kevin Noble Maillard (Syracuse)Joanne Barker (SF State)Cara Watt-Cowan (Cherokee Nation)Heather WIlliams (Cherokee Nation)Tiya Miles (U Michigan) ----Graphic: my great-great-grandfather, Jimmy Carter, c. 1885, Wewoka, OK [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 3:17 pm by Giles Peaker
The excellent Liz Davies of Garden Court tackled the Court of Appeal decisions in MA & Ors and the benefit cap judgment in SG & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 156. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 3:17 pm by Giles Peaker
The excellent Liz Davies of Garden Court tackled the Court of Appeal decisions in MA & Ors and the benefit cap judgment in SG & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 156. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:27 am by Ilyse Schuman
The guidance includes a detailed discussion of the three factors identified by the Eighth Circuit in its 1975 Green v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Consequently, as there was no medical evidence establishing a recognizable link between claimant's injuries and repetitive movements associated with her work activities, substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant did not establish that she sustained a causally-related occupational disease (see Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Barker v New York City Police Dept., 176 AD3d at 1272-1273; Matter of Glowczynski… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Consequently, as there was no medical evidence establishing a recognizable link between claimant's injuries and repetitive movements associated with her work activities, substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant did not establish that she sustained a causally-related occupational disease (see Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Barker v New York City Police Dept., 176 AD3d at 1272-1273; Matter of Glowczynski… [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
The Court applied the analytical framework as articulated in Barker v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:55 pm
The constitutional standard for a speedy trial was established by the United States Supreme Court in a case called Barker v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:04 pm
The state judiciary rejected these arguments, Hill v. [read post]