Search for: "BEEN v. BEEN" Results 141 - 160 of 191,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2022, 12:15 am
  Trajkovski argued that I.Am.Plus had lost its privilege to litigate because its registration as a foreign corporation had been been forfeited. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 7:20 am
By the following January, he had been placed on paid administrative leave. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by sally
Makisi v Birmingham City Council; Yosief v Same; Nagi v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 355; [2011] WLR (D) 124 “An applicant for housing under the homelessness provisions who, on an review of a decision to refuse accommodation, had a right to make oral representations where there had been a deficiency or irregularity in the original decision, could insist on a face-to-face hearing with the reviewer at which he or his representative could make representations. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
What muddied the waters in this area was the Supreme Court's decision in Hartman v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Human Rights at Home Blog
By Jeremiah Ho There has been much criticism over the emotional rhetoric of Justice Kennedy’s majority decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 12:00 am
He's a rabble-rouser.Ovalle v Publix by Rumpole21 on ScribdSite Feed [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:44 am
R (Kelly) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Bailey) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Gibson) v Governor of Wymott Prison [2008] EWCA Civ 177; [2008] WLR (D) 84 “Long-term prisoners who had been convicted of offences committed after 29 September 1998 and before 4 April 2005, and who after 4 April 2005 had been released on licence, recalled and then re-released having served three-quarters of their sentences, remained subject to licence… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:41 am by PaulKostro
Once a child has been emancipated, a perent is no longer obligated to pay child support, including insurance coverage. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 8:50 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
This has been an eventful week in law on a number of fronts. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:38 am by sally
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 4); Same v AN; Same v AE [2010] EWCA Civ 869; [2010] WLR (D) 205 “Control orders which the Secretary of State for the Home Department revoked rather than disclose the evidence on which they were made should have been quashed with effect from the dates they were made, because they were made in violation of the right to a fair trial under art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:41 am by traceydennis
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 4);  Same v AN; Same v AE [2010] EWCA Civ 869; [2010] WLR (D) 205 “Control orders which the Secretary of State for the Home Department revoked rather than disclose the evidence on which they were made should have been quashed with effect from the dates they were made, because they were made in violation of the right to a fair trial under art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and… [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:11 am by Maya Angenot
The New Code has since been adopted and will govern proceedings in Quebec beginning in the Fall of 2015. [read post]