Search for: "BES v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 68,451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am by Katy Sheridan
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:17 am by EMMY GIBBS, ATLEU
Introduction Judgment of the Supreme Court is handed down today in the case of Janah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“SSFCA”) and Libya, and Benkharbouche v SSFCA. [read post]
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:51 am
AS and DD (Libya) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 289; [2008] WLR (D) 104 “In order to show strong grounds for believing that a foreign national if deported would face a real risk of being subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment in breach of art 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms it was necessary to produce evidence, not mere speculation, to establish that risk. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:01 am by Andrew Hamm
Additional follow-on litigation to Johnson has involved questions about other aspects of ACCA’s “violent felony” definition, as in next term’s United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:47 am
Othman (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 290; [2008] WLR (D) 103 “The deportation of a foreign national on the ground that his presence was not conducive to the public good because he was a danger to the national security of the United Kingdom would breach that person's right to a fair trial under art 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms if in the receiving state he… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The judgment in NS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] QB 102 did refer to a systemic breach but the CJEU’s focus was on Member States’ awareness of such a breach, rather than the type of breach. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:31 pm by Norm Pattis
Blue called in sick today, causing another delay in the case of State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm by Bernadette Meyler
Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), and hold that the Eleventh Amendment bars states from being sued by individuals in the courts of their sister states. [read post]