Search for: "BRAY v. BRAY"
Results 141 - 160
of 381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2020, 2:00 pm
Just as Justice Scalia wrote in Bray v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 5:07 am
Nominations will be reviewed by a prize committee consisting of Professors Seth Davis (Berkeley), Gillian Metzger (Columbia), James Pfander (Northwestern), and Carlos Vázquez (Georgetown). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 6:03 am
Rev. 687 (2016), cited in Justice Thomas's dissent yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
(Sam Bray has articulated this point well). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 7:17 am
[whose encyclopedia entry on Fiduciary Remedies was cited twice by today's Justice Thomas dissent in Liu v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 7:35 am
[A cert petition to watch at the Supreme Court] For those who are interested in equitable remedies or the Seventh Amendment, there's an interesting cert petition by Seth Waxman et al. in TCL Communication Technology v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 7:57 am
” While the Tennessee Supreme Court made a ruling about single provider cases in Bray v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:48 am
Texas (consolidated with Texas v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:57 am
At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Samuel Bray runs down the amicus briefs and related articles discussing “the scope of the injunction” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm
Pennsylvania, consolidated with Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:04 am
A friend recently asked for a two-sentence summary of my view of Liu v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Nicholas Bagley highlights an amicus brief he and Samuel Bray submitted yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 6:07 pm
“The National Injunction Arrives at the Supreme Court; A Bagley-Bray amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:27 pm
[A Bagley-Bray amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:39 am
Bray 461–462. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:45 pm
Today's opinion concurring in the issuance of the stay, also joined by Justice Thomas, comes in Dep't of Homeland Security v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 6:58 am
Plaintiff argued that a HIPAA authorization was not required here, as the Supreme Court held in Bray v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
And in West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:54 am
Justice Thomas with opinion in Rotkiske v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 3:30 am
Invoking Sam Bray’s view of the national injunction as “unthinkable” by standards of “traditional equity,” Justice Clarence Thomas argued in a concurring opinion in Trump v. [read post]
