Search for: "BRENNAN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 141 - 160
of 285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm
” In his initial letter to the Justice Department, O’Neil also characterizes the department’s argument as holding that “all information Ms. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am
” It directed each relevant “department and agency . . . [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
First on the agenda is Murr v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
In issuing this new standard for defamation lawsuits brought by public officials, the Court and Justice William Brennan effectively shifted the burden of proof from the accused to the accuser. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am
Clapper, Jr. and then-CIA Director John Brennan agreed with Yates’s assessment and concurred with her recommendation to inform the White House. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:46 am
” Justice Brennan’s 1982 majority opinion … never once mentions preemption. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 10:18 am
Related Cases: Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
Holder v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:20 pm
Finally, John Brennan, the current CIA Director, admitted to misleading Congress about the CIA conducting an electronic espionage operation targeting the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:08 am
When it comes to the trust deficit regarding U.S. surveillance internationally, exhibit A is the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 12:01 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
Department of Justice. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
As her dear departed friend Justice Antonin Scalia used to say: “A lot of stuff that’s stupid is not unconstitutional. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 5:53 pm
Only two years ago, the Supreme Court held in Riley v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
(Disclosure: I worked with Garland in the Justice Department during the Clinton administration, and I think he is an excellent nominee.) [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
Justice Thomas discussed this history in his 2000 opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
” The majority departs from this position in this case, and also departs from the appeals court on this point. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
” And four Justices who only recently departed from the Court (William Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Antonin Scalia, and David Souter) joined them in condemning the anti-Catholic history of Blaine Amendments. [read post]
