Search for: "Baker v. Ives"
Results 141 - 160
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
In Buckley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
In the following guest post, Doug Greene, Jessie Gabriel, Marco Molina, and Brian Song of the Baker & Hostetler law firm take a comprehensive look at the decision, including its context and significance. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2018)Last year I taught a course on Corporate Social Responsibility Law for the very first time (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
In fact, US sugar protectionism is also putting a serious crimp in the company's (and other American bakers' and confectioners') bottom line: Since 1934, Congress has supported tariffs that benefit primarily a few handful of powerful Florida families while forcing US confectioners to pay nearly twice the global market price for sugar. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:15 pm
(see a similar draft finding in another Committee decision (ACCC/C/2008/23), criticising a decision by the Court of Appeal in Morgan & Baker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
The lateral hires of William Finnegan IV, Brett Braden, Charles Carpenter and Charles Timothy Fenn follow the opening of Latham's Houston office last month with hires from Baker Botts and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 1:36 pm
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South Africa): (Afro-IP), 15-16 September: US ACI 10th advanced forum on biotech patents… [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
Waitangi Day protest, 2006 (Photo by Flickr user Charlie Brewer, Feb. 6, 2006, used under Creative Commons License 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). 1901: In Nireaha Tamaki v Baker, the Privy Council in London ruled that the courts did have jurisdiction to determine whether the land in dispute had been ceded to the Crown, in contrast to the approach that the New Zealand courts had taken since the Wi Parata case. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
As described in the press release, the complaint (here) alleges that the offering documents failed to disclose that: sellers of the underlying mortgages to Deutsche Alt-A were issuing many of the mortgage loans to borrowers who: (i) did not meet the prudent or maximum debt-to-income ratio purportedly required by the lender; (ii) did not provide adequate documentation to support the income and assets required to issue the loans pursuant to the lenders’ own guidelines;… [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Hogan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
The Document Request directed the Debtor to provide to the Auditor, by February 14, 2007, copies of (i) payment advices or other evidence of payment from an employer for the six months preceding the Petition Date; (ii) federal income tax returns for the two most recent taxable periods; (iii) account statements for all depository and investment accounts in which the Debtor has an interest for the six months preceding the Petition Date; and (iv) if the debtor is divorced, the divorce decree,… [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
See Nobelman v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:42 am
IV Genuine climate change believers might therefore consider that the price of hitching their wagon to the UN might well have cost them the game, at least for some time to come. [read post]
6 May 2009, 12:47 am
Also included are the contents of the TRIG with the results of her own self-administered TRIG grief profile, including: (i) her thoughts as she considered each statement, (ii) her perceptions about what her overall scores mean, (iii) her reactions to taking it, (iv) why she rated each statement as she did, and (v) criticism of the scoring as an accurate portrayal of a grief response. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:45 am
Third, the government asserts that nothing in Title IV of the FISA prohibits the collection of such information. [read post]
