Search for: "Baker v. Long" Results 141 - 160 of 1,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
”[4] The SEC’s climate rule proposal broadly requires disclosure related to the following categories of information: Climate-related risks and their impacts on strategy, business model, and outlook Public companies must disclose the climate-related risks reasonably likely to have a material impact on the company over the short, medium, and long-term.[5] Companies must also disclose the actual and potential impacts of those risks on the company’s strategy, business model,… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
 Merpel remains puzzled as to why it takes so long for the nation's top court to give its rulings. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
Starting with the Court of Protection, G v E & Ors is a long-running case in which a 20-year-old man with severe learning disabilities was unlawfully removed from his long-term foster carer. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm by Zachary Spilman
The government’s argument ended with a long discussion of, essentially, Chief Judge Everett’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 12:24 pm
Judge Stucky wrote the plurality opinion, joined by Judge Baker. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:45 pm
This law essentially provides for the admission of recorded conversations as long as at least one party consented to the recording, unless the party making the recording acts with a purpose to violate state law or to commit a tortious act. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:20 am by Larry
Craig Claiborne, “Catfish, Long a Southern Delicacy, Branches Out,” N.Y. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am by DOUGLAS MCGREGOR, BRODIES LLP
In Baker v Willoughby [1970] AC 467 the House of Lords had confirmed that causation and blameworthiness were the two elements in any assessment of liability under the Act. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:15 pm by Richard M. Re
"  Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Stewart Baker suggested that Leon's exclamations undermined the persuasiveness of his opinion. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
South is of course far larger and more wide-ranging than just the direct legacy of Brown v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Indeed, the kind of Norwich Pharmacal order sought by the plaintiff in Muwema had been granted in the High Court in London as long ago as 2008 (see Applause Store Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) (24 July 2008)) and was recently granted in Nova Scotia in Olsen v Facebook 2016 NSSC 155 (CanLII) (17 June 2016)). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm by Michael Risch
In my 2014 post, I noted how Sega put it: “To the extent that a work is functional or factual, it may be copied,Baker v. [read post]