Search for: "Baker v. Nelson" Results 141 - 160 of 208
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
  That turned up cases applying the same rationale under federal law:  Baker v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Tuesday's Minneapolis Star Tribune reports that the trial court relied on a 1971 Minnesota Supreme Court decision-- Baker v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 4:02 am by Lawrence Solum
Nelson, dealing with the constitutional status of same-sex marriage; Iqbal v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:44 am by Lawrence Solum
Nelson, dealing with the constitutional status of same-sex marriage; Iqbal v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
Heritage Music Foundation (TTABlog) Precedential no. 4: TTAB finds that “NKJV” has acquired distinctiveness for bibles: In re Thomas Nelson, Inc (TTABlog) Precedential no. 3: Finding KUBA KUBA primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive for cigars, TTAB affirms 2(e)(3) refusal: In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate (TTABlog) Precedential no. 2: TTAB cancels supplemental registration for shape of culvert unit due to functionality: Kistner Concrete Products, Inc.… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:01 pm
 But I find Judge Hudson's analysis here defensible nonetheless because the older cases have not been formally overruled, and as I have noted recently in discussing the Prop 8 litigation and Baker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:42 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Maybe I'm reading his facial expression wrong.The rest of the emphasis I could get from the proponents' argument rested on Baker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Cooper was ready with a precedent of his own, the Court’s 1982 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:08 pm
 In 1972, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from the ruling of the Minnesota Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
  This was a reference to the Supreme Court decision in 1972 in the case of Baker v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:09 am by Jenny Egan
 In today’s Washington Post, Edwin Meese has an op-ed piece in which he argues that Judge Walker’s decision ignored binding Supreme Court precedent – namely, Baker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:59 am by Lyle Denniston
  For that, they relied on the Justices’ one-line ruling on Oct. 10, 1971, in Baker v. [read post]