Search for: "Banning Company v. California"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm
This is a very significant setback for Apple, which less than six months ago had already failed, despite a partly-successful appeal, to obtain a sales ban against Samsung in the first California litigation between the two companies, an outcome that Apple accepted as final about a month ago when it withdrew its related cross-appeal.The denial of an injunction following the recent trial in the second California case is based on Apple's failure to satisfy the… [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
The GDPR took 4 years to develop; in contrast, the California legislature will spend a grand total of 7 days working on this major bill. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:30 am
Olson and David Boies, the lawyers for the two gay couples who sued California over the ban; Charles J. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:05 pm
’s Union Station [Reyen v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm
The Tribal Business Council of the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Portland General Electric Company v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:18 pm
Oct. 7, 2014); and Langston v. 20/20,Companies, Inc., 2014 Wl 5335734 (C.D. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 7:12 am
In that case, a California trial court had originally temporarily blocked the Center from releasing surreptitiously recorded video of a conversation with “leaders of a California company that provides fetal tissue to researchers,” but later suggested that a more permanent injunction shouldn’t be issued. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:24 am
But that is precisely what Judge James Robertson of the San Francisco Superior Court appears to have done recently in Guardsmark v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:24 pm
But that is precisely what Judge James Robertson of the San Francisco Superior Court appears to have done recently in Guardsmark v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 12:06 pm
V&L Produce, Inc. of Vernon, CA, will pay $6,000. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:55 am
Koh had the pleasure to terminate the long-running Apple v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 7:00 am
The lawsuit, Bird Rides v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States); or even in one’s enclosed but not fully covered “curtilage” when viewed from an airplane (California v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
District Court for the Northern District of California and although Apple requested a quick trial, Samsung countered by claiming that Apple is “attempting to create an emergency where none exists. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:06 pm
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:42 am
On March 28, 2017, the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Griffin v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Link to decision in HEARST STATIONS INC. v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:42 am
To the extent Facebook can’t technologically identify who is an Illinois resident compared with, say, a California resident, the court’s ruling means that the Illinois statute will affect interactions wholly within California between a California company and California residents. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” Butler v. [read post]
