Search for: "Barber v. Wells"
Results 141 - 160
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 26 July 2010, the libel trial in Bryce v Barber will begin in front of Mr Justice Tugendhat and a jury. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 3:01 am
It would be well worth your time, if you are interested in libel law or blogging, reading these: Victory for Gray and Hilton Jack of Kent blog post Judgment: Kaschke v Gray, Hilton. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:54 am
But given the growing concern in judicial circles about the problem of underfunded indigent counsel, the New York could well be a harbinger of things to come. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:39 am
Home Office v IC EA/2010/0011. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
Well, in Barber v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:14 am
Lanning to include the opinion and a recap by Stanford Law School’s Sina Kian, and the case page for Barber v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
Barber v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:24 pm
That was the question before the Supreme Court in today's decision of Barber v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 7:42 pm
Barber Foods. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Following Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor [2010] 1 WLR 446 and Barber v Croydon LBC[2010] EWCA Civ 51 (and contra Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] 1 WLR 2365), at issue is a series of decisions, from deciding to serve notice through to enforcement of a warrant. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Following Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor [2010] 1 WLR 446 and Barber v Croydon LBC[2010] EWCA Civ 51 (and contra Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] 1 WLR 2365), at issue is a series of decisions, from deciding to serve notice through to enforcement of a warrant. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:45 am
In Barber v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:12 am
Consider Brogan v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
The homelessness cases were never going to succeed because there was CA authority in the way (Barber and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield DC [2009] EWCA Civ 285). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
The homelessness cases were never going to succeed because there was CA authority in the way (Barber and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield DC [2009] EWCA Civ 285). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 7:59 pm
To the case page for Barber v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm
So what gave CT a case of the chuckles during Barber v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm
Carl Cecere of Akin Gump has previewed Tuesday’s upcoming argument in Barber v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
In particular, the problem of Fry J's well-known five probanda in Willmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96, at 105, which has bedevilled this area in the past, is again at stake here because eg it was not known whether the Defendants' predecessor in title had made a mistake as to his legal rights (probanda 1). [read post]
