Search for: "Barclay v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 346
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2015, 9:43 pm by Marta Requejo
Barclays, Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (2014), 1095). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
Factual background As previously reported on UKSC blog (here and here), this case emerged in the aftermath of a successful 2009 judicial review[1] brought by British businessmen Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay (the “Barclay brothers”) in respect of the Reform (Sark) Law 2008 (the “2008 Law”). [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Toulson stated that considering the principles of Target Holdings v Redfern, a monetary reward which reflects neither loss caused nor profit gained by the wrongdoer, such as the one argued by the appellant, would be penal. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
: 3-16177Case filed: September 29, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 29, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-115 In the Matter of Barclays Capital Inc.Administrative Proceeding File No. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 1:13 pm by Mark Astarita
" Years later the Supreme Court adopted this misreading, in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Finnerty, of Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, of Buffalo, represented the wife. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 4:32 pm by Kit Walsh
Files: tveyes_sj_opinion.pdfRelated Issues: Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the BalanceDigital VideoRelated Cases: Barclays v TheFlyOnTheWall.comAuthors Guild v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
In this Kat's opinion, furthermore copyright does not only vest in those extracts that include the copyright-protected works mentioned by the CJEU, including the Premier League and Barclays logos, as Arnold J clarified in FAPL v BSkyB and Others (see paras 8 ff; this action originated as an application for a blocking injunction as per section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)).There is also copyright in those broadcast extracts which… [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK By ERIC T. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am by Heather Green, University of Aberdeen
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in  R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
It alleges that during the class period the defendants misled these investors by making false or misleading statement or failing to disclose that   (i) Barclays engaged in a “systematic pattern of fraud and deceit” by using its dark pool to favor high-frequency traders over its other clients; (ii) the pools were promoted as offering investors protection from predatory traders, while Barclays instead courted HFT firms by charging them lower rates; (iii)… [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Barclay & Anor) v SSJ and Lord Chancellor & Ors, heard 30 June 2014. [read post]