Search for: "Barnes v. Washington"
Results 141 - 160
of 992
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:12 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court rules for woman who says county took too much for tax debt. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:48 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court weighs far-reaching effects of Calif. pork restrictions. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:30 am
Marimow and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post report that “Native adoptions can give priority to tribal families, Supreme Court rules. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:42 pm
Supreme Court in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 8:28 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Law on placement of Native American children divides Supreme Court; Justices seemed inclined to reconsider parts of law that prioritizes foster or adoptive parents based on tribal status. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court won’t revive Kansas voting law requiring proof of citizenship (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court takes sides in interstate river flow fight (Pamela King, E&E News) Supreme Court puts off ruling on Trump census case to exclude undocumented immigrants (Pete Williams, NBC News) Why Trump’s attempt to steal the election was too much even for Republican… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:57 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court weighs whether its ruling requiring unanimous juries should be applied retroactively. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:10 am
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Barrett was trustee at private school with anti-gay policies (Michelle Smith & Michael Biesecker, Associated Press) Supreme Court split in Pa. election case raises questions about how a Justice Barrett would rule (Seung Min Kim & Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court’s Pennsylvania mail ballot ruling tees up test for Barrett (John Kruzel, The Hill) Poll: Majority says… [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 5:00 pm
“Supreme Court struggles with when police may enter home for safety checks or suicide threats”: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:58 am
” Briefly: In a series at RegBlog, Allison Hoffman looks at the Court’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:40 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court limits federal law requiring enhanced sentences for repeat offenders. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 8:03 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court considers whether predecessors made a mistake 40 years ago. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:54 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes invites readers to “reflect on the fact that — once again — folks had to sleep on the sidewalk for days to see or hear the Supreme Court at work,” waiting for up to four days to gain access to the oral argument earlier this month in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has a news update headlined "Justices question next step for massive Wal-Mart discrimination suit. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:36 pm
In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined “Supreme Court appears ready to say excessive fine prohibition applies to states. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 10:58 am
“Ruth Bader Ginsburg back on bench as Supreme Court resumes hearings”: Robert Barnes and Mark Berman of The Washington Post have this report. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 5:32 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court contemplates whether man who cannot remember crime may be executed. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 7:22 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Trump’s Supreme Court nominees appear to differ on immigration case. [read post]
