Search for: "Baron v. Baron" Results 141 - 160 of 532
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Michael Geist has examined the case of Google v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:20 am by Peter Mahler
The hard lesson learned by the petitioner in Matter of Norvell v Guchi’s Idea LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 32307(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 18, 2016], has been taught before, starting most prominently with the First Department’s 2013 decision in Doyle v Icon, LLC and reinforced by that court two years later in Barone v Sowers, holding that minority member claims of oppressive majority conduct including systematic exclusion from the LLC’s… [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm by Jared Beck
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 7:54 am by Charlie Dunlap
PDF version  A review of Rosa Brooks' How Everything Became War and the Military Became Everything: Tales From the Pentagon (Simon and Schuster 2016). *** If you’re like me, you may dread long plane trips, not out of anxiety about flying, but rather out of fear of being stuck next to a loquacious but studiously uninformed traveler. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:24 am by Amy Starnes
The latest, and perhaps largest, wound to the information act is a 2015 Texas Supreme Court decision known as Boeing v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 1:29 pm by ADeStefano
 Second Department Concludes That Pre-Judgment Interest Is Not Triggered By a Stipulation of LiabilityIn Mahoney v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 1:29 pm by ADeStefano
 Second Department Concludes That Pre-Judgment Interest Is Not Triggered By a Stipulation of LiabilityIn Mahoney v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am by Bill Marler
With a Salmonella Outbreak raging, might be a good time to ask that question – again. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 1:26 pm
See California Business and Professions Code Section 6125, and a California Supreme Court ruling, Baron v. [read post]
Mrs Gohil issued an application for financial remedy and the Financial Dispute Resolution appointment was heard before Mrs Justice Baron on 30 April 2004. [read post]