Search for: "Barrett Co. v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:04 am by Josh Blackman
On May 29, 2020, the Supreme Court denied an injunction in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 10:58 am by Ilya Somin
Barrett's previously stated views—including her testimony at her confirmation hearings—suggest her position may be similar to Kavanaugh's. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  In theory, the Court “has an obligation to satisfy itself … of its own jurisdiction," Steel Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:02 am by Josh Blackman
[Resolutions to approve the acceptance of foreign gifts and emoluments must be presented to the President] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] The Foreign Emoluments Clause provides that "[N]o Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
(the link is to the decision that is being appealed), and my students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Scott Sia worked on the brief. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]