Search for: "Barrett v. Smith" Results 141 - 160 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am by Trane Robinson
  So, for example, Justice Barrett’s lovely opinion for the unanimous Court in Lindke v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Smith (1990), the Court drastically cut back on the protection provided by the Free Exercise Clause, and in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
  In support of this argument, Mooppan and CSS lawyer Lori Windham repeatedly cited Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:26 am by Russ Bensing
Smith, where the court affirms the dismissal of a case on speedy trial grounds. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
Barrett Financial * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Barrett notes that Burford invested $4 million in the Ecuador case in 2010. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
Emory International Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2013, Emory Legal Studies Research Paper Alexander Barrett Weaver The web host’s privilege of limited liability: its application to operators of commentary rooms. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:58 am by George Quillin and Jeanne Gills
With regard to the constitutional violation, Roberts (joined by Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett) noted that the starting point for each party’s analysis was Edmond v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am by Reference Staff
Joan Smith Lawrence was the first woman to serve as Supreme Court Commissioner. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Smith, the justices summarily ordered Arkansas to provide names of same-sex partners on birth certificates. [read post]