Search for: "Barrett v. Smith" Results 141 - 160 of 231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2021, 11:26 am by Emanuela Tala
During oral argument, newly-appointed Justice Amy Coney Barrett pointed out that CSS urged in its briefing that Smith should be overruled. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
As Smith itself made clear, the Yoder line of precedent—which stretches back to at least Meyer v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am by SHG
Smith—a 2017 Supreme Court case in which the Court also sided with the same-sex parents. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm by Linda McClain
To Justice Barrett’s question about a social service agency raising a religious objection to interracial marriage, Windham answered by citing to Loving v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
The new Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, whom most people assume is not a friend to the Smith decision, pointedly asked CSS's counsel: [Y]ou argue in your brief that Smith should be overruled. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
  In support of this argument, Mooppan and CSS lawyer Lori Windham repeatedly cited Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Josh Blackman
Third, we got an early glimpse of how Justice Barrett views stare decisis, Smith, and Sherbert. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Smith, the free exercise case that is at stake in Fulton. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm by Amy Howe
The court’s newest justice, Amy Coney Barrett, appeared less enthusiastic about overruling Smith. [read post]
With the addition of Barrett, however, the court’s conservatives may no longer need the chief’s vote to overrule Smith. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:10 am by James Romoser
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Barrett was trustee at private school with anti-gay policies (Michelle Smith & Michael Biesecker, Associated Press) Supreme Court split in Pa. election case raises questions about how a Justice Barrett would rule (Seung Min Kim & Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court’s Pennsylvania mail ballot ruling tees up test for Barrett (John Kruzel, The Hill)… [read post]